Wikipedia has taken the unprecedented decision to black out all English language content of its web site for 24 hours to raise awareness of SOPA and PIPA.
If you are reading this during the blackout you can view the site by adding ?banner=none to the url. Try this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?banner=none for example. You can also disable your browser from running JavaScript and then you can view the website perfectly fine.
In this oppressive, hierarchical, control freak world we live in, there are too many jerks who think they are important and know what's best for everyone else. Their methods have been proven consistently throughout history to benefit no one but themselves and actually to cause a great deal of harm to the majority of nice folk.
Those sanctimonious dictatorial prats waltzing around the halls of power in their clean cut suits pontificating to all and sundry about the moral values that need to be maintained are nothing more than vicious little bullies. They are self-serving opinionated bastards. They are no better than Colonel Gaddafi and his security forces or the Nazis or Fascists. The only difference is that they are fooling enough people at the moment to avoid having to use open violence.
But their need for control is insatiable. They continually erode the hard won acknowledgement of real human values. They are relentless in their attempts to define and control the world and how it works. Ironically King Canute sat on the beach to make the point that he was not all powerful. He has been entirely misrepresented by control freaks. It is ironic because they (the control freaks) actually think they have more power than they actually have and try to illustrate that they understand the limitations of their power by ridiculing Canute. It is a little like the ancient Turks who religiously put mistakes in their rugs because only God could make a perfect rug. The irony is missed on control freaks
These rather intellectually stunted testosterone driven gnomes relentlessly interfere with perfectly good principles in their egocentric attempts to prove themselves "good" by making new laws to protect individuals from harm. But the only individuals they "protect" are themselves and their cronies from being hoist by their own values.
I have a hard time believing the utter ridiculousness of laws which profess to protect liberty but are clearly quite the opposite. I have spent too much of my valuable life troubled by, and wondering about, these issues. The conclusion to date is that people in power are grossly stupid and that they succeed insofar as they manage to dull the minds of so many people that they get away with it.
SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect Intellectual Property Act) are the two issues which are currently scheduled for debate in America and which have given rise to Wikipedia's 24 hour blackout. I have read around the subject and both these proposed laws essentially turn things on their heads. If you consider the premise that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty these laws do just the reverse. If, for example, someone leaves a comment on my blog with a link to a site which is linked to a site (presumably ad infinitum) which has content which is simply believed in good faith (woolly phraseology) by some authority to be in breach of any law then I am, by association, assumed to be guilty and my website can simply be shut down until I can prove in a court of law that the final offending material is not in fact illegal. These proposed laws are simply broad brush legalised censorship. They are intellectually contradictory (they would make the activities of the White House illegal but - hey - what's new?), pretentiously complicated and basically bullies giving themselves a sense of legitimacy.
I personally object strongly to the American Administration making utterly brainless and bad laws like SOPA and PIPA and I don't even live in the USA.
Freedom is not only freedom to do what the hierarchy demands. To have a free society one has to accept that sometimes some people will do things you don't like or agree with. The thing is you have to deal with those occasions when they arise and not make laws to prohibit anything that might be undesirable. And it is very important to prevent the bullies and the bad guys from making the laws. It is essential that the control freaks do not alter the laws for their benefit. It is what happened in Germany prior to the Second World War and precipitated the holocaust and it is currently happening in the USA, the UK, many countries in Europe and God knows where else.
By the way - the holocaust never happened!
Woops! Don't link to my web site now or you might be taken down.
Why did Kemi Badenoch send a man who caused a Tory crisis to the Lords?
-
The Tory leader has been talking up her six new peers - leading This Writer
to ask: why did Kemi Badenoch send a man who caused a Tory crisis to the
Lord...
10 hours ago
this is dead on.
ReplyDeleteYou know, at my age I lived most of it without the internut and got by just fine, I think I can do without Wikipedia for a day. Or the whole fucking internut for that matter, when I go camping I'm not often in touch with it and keep steaming along just fine. The internut is just a bunch of monkeys fucking around in different ways than we used to fuck around.
ReplyDeleteOh dear. Having written that green line, you are now guilty of a crime in Germany. So stay away.
ReplyDeleteOther than that, your essay is good.
lol this is not an essay
ReplyDelete