I was going to use the headline:
41 DEAD AS MURDER HORNETS RAMPAGE CHINESE PROVINCE
But having written this perusal around the manipulation of figures I decided "MURDER HORNETS KILL MORE THAN COVID-19" was even more indicative of how ridiculous headlines can be. It is true, because murder hornets did kill more than Covid-19 in Shaanxi. It is true, but it is so extraordinarily misleading that it is, effectively, a lie. These things can be fun to play with, but they are becoming a death knell for humanity due to social media, psyops, asymmetric communication, and an intellectually and emotionally damaged population.
The 'headline' for this blog post was gleaned from the most dramatic single statement I could find in a Wikipedia article about the Asian giant hornet, or vespa mandarinia, which is currently being called the Murder Hornet in Click Bait Press. The actual statement was "In 2013, stings by Asian giant hornets killed 41 people and injured more than 1,600 people in Shaanxi, China." The first thing to consider is that that is an extreme case so we can deduce that the situation is probably far better than that. It is also in a particular location where the wasps are relatively common, and it is likely that people go looking for them because they like to eat their larvae. The second thing that comes to mind is a comparison with the distorted and dramatised figures relating to Covid-19 deaths. Covid-19 appears, by all accounts, to be significantly more dangerous and deadly to humans than giant hornets. But it still remains extremely difficult to get any clear or meaningful idea of the significance and impact of Covid-19 from the persistent click bait headlines distorting the very meaning of the information presented.
Shaanxi province has a population of 37.33 million, so 41 deaths equates to 1.1 deaths per million per year. That extrapolates to 85,800 deaths in the world population in 10 years or 858,000 deaths per century. Assuming the human population might rise then one could speculate that over 1 million people could die of killer wasp stings in the 21st century. Of course with this kind of manipulation of figures one could attempt to reduce the target population to specific named areas where more deaths have occurred. Maybe 20 of those 41 deaths occurred in a village of 2,000 people raising the 'deaths per million' rate to 10,000. It's not long before you arrive at a figure of 100% of people killed by killer wasps die. It is equally true to say that there is a very high probability (not one I am about to work out now) that 0% of people you know will die from a wasp sting. I wonder what quantum probability wave function collapse might tell us about this - or what this might tell us about probability wave function collapse.
Maybe I could find a way to justify the headline "Quantum physics predicts everyone will die from Killer Wasps". Or better still "Science predicts everyone will die from Killer Wasps". All I have to do is write a small article explaining that in multiple universe theory there is one universe where that is true and I can claim the headline is factually correct and get some lucrative advertising revenue from my click bait science article.
Taking this to extremes it is true to say "Murder Hornets kill more than 10 times as many as Covid-19" or maybe "Murder Wasps 10 times more deadly than Covid-19". I just have to explain in the text that 3 people have been reported to have died in Shaanxi province from Covid-19 whilst vespa mandarinia killed 41 people in the same province in 2013.
Warning: Stay Alert in Click Bait World - It's Dangerous Out There.
No comments:
Post a Comment